On Wednesday 21 March 2007 21:57 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:58 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > As an alternative to a bitfield, one option is a dictionary of > > properties. This is most likely nicer than a bitfield in say python, > > and more annoying than a bitfield in C. > > Yes, a dictionary might be nice, but it's not trivial to access in C. > This stuff really needs to be *trivial* for an application to access, > hence why I think booleans are probably best. How likely is an application written in C not going to use the D-Bus glib bindings? (Assuming that these bindings support dictionaries) Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
pgpa2prDnAJcO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
