Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Wednesday 21 March 2007 21:57 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:58 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote: > >>> As an alternative to a bitfield, one option is a dictionary of >>> properties. This is most likely nicer than a bitfield in say python, >>> and more annoying than a bitfield in C. >> Yes, a dictionary might be nice, but it's not trivial to access in C. >> This stuff really needs to be *trivial* for an application to access, >> hence why I think booleans are probably best. > > How likely is an application written in C not going to use the D-Bus glib > bindings? > > (Assuming that these bindings support dictionaries)
heh, dbus-glib does support dicts, but it returns it as a GHashTable. Its not exactly the nicest way of reading a set of flags... Rob Taylor _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
