On Thursday 22 March 2007 06:55 +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Kevin Krammer wrote: > >> Yes, a dictionary might be nice, but it's not trivial to access in C. > >> This stuff really needs to be *trivial* for an application to access, > >> hence why I think booleans are probably best. > > > >How likely is an application written in C not going to use the D-Bus > > glib bindings? > > Any library designed to be used by other languages.
Hmm, I thought that the main idea in D-Bus is to always use bindings. How would one deal with D-Bus APIs that already use dictionationaries? Just ignore those methods in wrappers? Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
pgpMoy0bJr2Y3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
