On Friday 01 June 2007 11:16:55 Leo Sauermann wrote: > It was Evgeny Egorochkin who said at the right time 31.05.2007 16:40 the > > following words: > > On Thursday 31 May 2007 17:27:46 jamie wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:50 +0300, Evgeny Egorochkin wrote: > >>> On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:50:24 Antoni Mylka wrote: > >>> > >>> 3) RDF object is always literal. Can't directly reference > >>> resources.(has workarounds). > >> > >> what are the workarounds? > > > > The workaround is to specify an URI as a literal and hope software > > understands this in cases like linking archive contents. > > I miss the whole discussion, but RDF objects in statements are either > literal, blank nodes, or URIs. > like this (turtle syntax): > <file://home/dirk/blub.txt> nie:myExampleUri <http://exampleuri>. > <file://home/dirk/blub.txt> nie:myExampleString "Unterzögersdorf".
Yes, but xesam decided to limit objects to literals only(as well as other limitations) and lift them only if it is necessary. That is xesam is fully RDFS-compliant, yet we implement the smallest necessary subset of it for performance, coding complexity and other considerations. --Evgeny _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
