2007/5/30, Evgeny Egorochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all, I'd like you to take a look at the ontology sketch http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/PhreedomDraft?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=viz.png It's not complete. Some fields/classes are dropped intentionally. I'd like to hear some feedback first. Points of interest: *** Sources *Source hierarchy *Which properties belong to content and which to source?
I was just scanning through http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~mylka/nie.pdf<http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/%7Emylka/nie.pdf>. As far as I can read in Nepomuk DataSource does not derive from DataObject. Also it states that a DataObject is something where you can physically retrieve some bytes in some way or other. Taking this into account I don't think it makes sense to let User derive from DataObject either. Personally I would prefer to have a field Category and a field Source, but I know from IRC that this will cause trouble in some implementations, but I would like to have this stuff discussed on-the-record so to speak; so please chime in with your concerns regarding this. Cheers, Mikkel PS: Sorry for sending this twice Evgeny, my touchpad is playing tricks on me :-)
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
