On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:54:41PM +0100, Jakob Petsovits wrote: > On Monday, 26. November 2007, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:08:28PM +0100, Jakob Petsovits wrote: > > > I would guess this doesn't map too well to a predefined set of protocols? > > > > I don't understand that sentence... > > Eh, sorry. I meant that it would probably be a good idea to somehow allow a > set of protocols that is dynamically assigned to an application.
Indeed, but then it is a completly different thing. Certainly like the vfs/plugins stuff. What I propose is to have a list of static protocol possibilities of applications. It certainly doesn't solve all the issues surrounding protocol handling, but it solves some, and is very simple and similar with something that already exists (the mime support). -- Pat _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
