On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 10:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 00:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > Its been a month since I sent out this proposal, and the only comment I > > have heard so far is that the name "Content types" may be slightly > > ambiguous. My proposal for addressing this is to change the section > > title to "Content types for volumes", and stick with x-content for the > > type, since it is already in use. > > > > If there is no further feedback, I'd like to move ahead with adding this > > to the spec, since we want to implement content type sniffing in gvfs > > soon. > > Here is an updated version of the patch for the spec, using a less > ambiguous title and adding some more details. > > Bastien, if there is no more feedback, can you commit this when you come > back ?
That looks good to me, apart from ignore-case. I think we should default to ignoring the case, as I can't think of any content types for which we shouldn't (a pure 8.3 CD will show AUTORUN.INF, probably Autorun.inf for Joliet, and autorun.inf with Rockridge/Unix support). Could you send me your latest patches privately? I'll take care of creating the test suite for the types we handle right now, and probably update totem-pl-parser's totem-disc to use the functionality. Cheers PS: Resent with the subscribed e-mail address... _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg