On Thursday 09 July 2009, David Faure wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > * we provide a process in which ALL projects can register their > > acceptance, implementation, rejection, etc of specs > > Yes, actually that's what was suggested during the meeting. > The initial idea of a global "fd.o approved" / "fd.o rejected" status > quickly turned into something that was more like > gnome-approved [yes/no] kde-approved [yes/no] xfce-approved [yes/no] > lxde-approved [yes/no] etc.
sounds good. if this information is machine readable, then we're golden. > (which is separate from "implemented in gnome > 2.4; implemented in kde 4.3", of course; we can approve something much > before finding the time to implement it) right; that information is more useful to those targeting the specs. > (Technically it's: [yes | no | not decided yet], of course) yes | no | rejected | not decided. ;) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
