On Jul 9, 2009, at 4:46 AM, "Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009, David Faure wrote: >> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >>> * we provide a process in which ALL projects can register their >>> acceptance, implementation, rejection, etc of specs >> >> Yes, actually that's what was suggested during the meeting. >> The initial idea of a global "fd.o approved" / "fd.o rejected" status >> quickly turned into something that was more like >> gnome-approved [yes/no] kde-approved [yes/no] xfce-approved [yes/no] >> lxde-approved [yes/no] etc. > > sounds good. if this information is machine readable, then we're > golden. > >> (which is separate from "implemented in gnome >> 2.4; implemented in kde 4.3", of course; we can approve something >> much >> before finding the time to implement it) > > right; that information is more useful to those targeting the specs. > >> (Technically it's: [yes | no | not decided yet], of course) > > yes | no | rejected | not decided. ;) Hehe, what's the difference between no and rejected? I think three options suffice. Jeremy whiting > > -- > Aaron J. Seigo > humru othro a kohnu se > GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 > > KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software > _______________________________________________ > xdg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
