On 2/17/2010 11:17 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:05:08AM -0500, Jeff Mitchell wrote: >> On 2/17/2010 10:36 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: >>> At the risk of being overly blunt -- it's a fucking wiki. There's an >>> edit button; I'm willing to bet that it's fixable in far, far less time >>> than it took to write this email. >> >> Can I just point out that editing fucking information on a fucking wiki >> that has to do with core fucking FDO policies may not be something that >> normal fucking people feel fucking comfortable with fucking doing, at >> the risk of incurring the same fucking kind of mighty fucking wrath as >> was just fucking displayed above? > > Actually, it's a missing link on one page, rather than a change of a > core fdo policy per se.
I didn't say it was a change to the core fdo policy. I said that editing a paragraph containing core fdo policy might be intimidating for people who aren't sure if they will end up being rebuffed or complained for their efforts. And you're right -- the Getting Involved page does not include a link to the Account Requests page, which is a problem, since it means the Getting Involved page doesn't really tell people how to get involved (as a developer). But searching for "account" turns up the Account Request page as the second link, so it's not like it's not discoverable. --Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
