hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2014, at 4:13, Lennart Poettering wrote: > I certainly welcome standardization efforts for doing the > session-specific inhibitors, but I really don't buy the ideas of > stacking this on top of the lower level stuff. > > If the lower level stuff is missing features, we can certainly add those > to the lower level bits...
The main issue of everything you've said is that it assumes that everyone will use logind. That's your opinion about how the world should work, but I don't think we're quite there yet. If logind could put a service on the session bus which implemented a common API (ie: not one that was part of the org.freedesktop.login1 API) for this then I'd already be much happier. I really think the session bus part is necessary because other people implementing this API are much more likely to be in a position to do it as a session service than as a system service. Even that would not make me completely happy, however, because I couldn't handle all of my inhibit needs there (unless you were willing to expand the list of things you support inhibiting, for informational purposes for the session to see). Cheers _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
