yeah, I'll put my hand up for it, but... I'm dying to finish the websphere
stuff, mainly because I checked in a half finsihed job so it could be
looked at... and I haven't made time to do it so far... a chance this
weekend...
I assume you mean "methods" not "classes" (o: I should also verify that
aside from the methods below, there are no other methods we want to
include for ejb2 cmp? Having given this 30 seconds thought - I'll do it
before the websphere stuff, should be a pretty simple job.
cheesr
dim
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Dave Smith wrote:
> Does that mean your going to take the bull by the horns and do it? I
> would also add empty stubs if the following classes did not exsist.
>
> setEntityContext
> unsetEntityContext
> ejbActivate
> ejbPassivate
> ejbRemove
> ejbLoad
> ejbStore
>
> Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
>
> > Yeah, essentially the template would be only a fraction of what is there
> > for ejb1.1 - Probably different enough to warrant breaking it into two
> > different templates, well, one entitycmp.j with a conditional include.
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Dave Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> >>This is something I have been pondering the last few days...
> >>Lets say that I have a thick swing client that connects to the EJB
> >>server. How do I get bulk data transfers from the client to server in 1
> >>pop. (Ie fill in a customer info page and now take that entire rec and
> >>create a new entity). You could use the bulk data classes that we have
> >>now and extend the orginal bean but it would also have to be abstract
> >>and we would only add the getData and setData methods. We should also
> >>take out the dirty flag as most 2.0 containers will handle this.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>- modified entitycmp impl to not generate anything if ejbspec=2.0
> >>>>cause ejb 2.0 uses abstract schema
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>I know you mentioned this yesterday (day before?), but I'm just wondering
> >>>about setData/getData. afaik they're not covered by ejb2, so there would
> >>>still be some use in generating them would there not?
> >>>
> >>>cheers
> >>>dim
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
