The "not generate anything if ejbspec=2.0 cause ejb 2.0 uses abstract
schema" was just for letting Dave actually test relations. Go ahead.
Ara.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dmitri Colebatch
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:46 AM
> To: Dave Smith
> Cc: Ara Abrahamian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: 'xdoclet/core/samples/script
> build.xml'
>
> yeah, I'll put my hand up for it, but... I'm dying to finish the
websphere
> stuff, mainly because I checked in a half finsihed job so it could be
> looked at... and I haven't made time to do it so far... a chance this
> weekend...
>
> I assume you mean "methods" not "classes" (o: I should also verify
that
> aside from the methods below, there are no other methods we want to
> include for ejb2 cmp? Having given this 30 seconds thought - I'll do
it
> before the websphere stuff, should be a pretty simple job.
>
> cheesr
> dim
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Dave Smith wrote:
>
> > Does that mean your going to take the bull by the horns and do it? I
> > would also add empty stubs if the following classes did not exsist.
> >
> > setEntityContext
> > unsetEntityContext
> > ejbActivate
> > ejbPassivate
> > ejbRemove
> > ejbLoad
> > ejbStore
> >
> > Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, essentially the template would be only a fraction of what is
> there
> > > for ejb1.1 - Probably different enough to warrant breaking it into
two
> > > different templates, well, one entitycmp.j with a conditional
include.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Dave Smith wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>This is something I have been pondering the last few days...
> > >>Lets say that I have a thick swing client that connects to the EJB
> > >>server. How do I get bulk data transfers from the client to server
in
> 1
> > >>pop. (Ie fill in a customer info page and now take that entire rec
and
> > >>create a new entity). You could use the bulk data classes that we
have
> > >>now and extend the orginal bean but it would also have to be
abstract
> > >>and we would only add the getData and setData methods. We should
also
> > >>take out the dirty flag as most 2.0 containers will handle this.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>- modified entitycmp impl to not generate anything if
ejbspec=2.0
> > >>>>cause ejb 2.0 uses abstract schema
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>I know you mentioned this yesterday (day before?), but I'm just
> wondering
> > >>>about setData/getData. afaik they're not covered by ejb2, so
there
> would
> > >>>still be some use in generating them would there not?
> > >>>
> > >>>cheers
> > >>>dim
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
