See item 10 of the v1.0 list :-)
Ara.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dmitri Colebatch
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] nested src path elements
>
> hey,
>
> I was just going to do feature request #453663
>
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=453663&group_i
d=
> 31602&atid=402707) -
> add support for nested src elements. The request basically asks that
> xdoclet behaves similar to the javac task, which leads me to the point
> that the javac task expects syntax like:
>
> <javac destdir="${platform.bcf.build.classes.dir}"
> debug="on"
> deprecation="off"
> optimize="off"
> includes="com/nuix/**/*.java"
> excludes="com/nuix/component/**/*.java"
> >
> <src path="${platform.bcf.src.java.dir}" />
> <src path="${platform.bcf.src.components.dir}" />
>
> ....
>
> but xdoclet wants:
>
> <ejbdoclet
> sourcepath="${java.dir}"
> destdir="${generated.java.dir}"
> classpathref="project.class.path"
> excludedtags="@version,@author"
> ejbspec="2.0">
>
> <fileset dir="${java.dir}">
> <include name="**/*Bean.java" />
> </fileset>
>
> ....
>
> the key difference being sourcepath <-> src. My question is then
should
> we phase out (or remove) the sourcepath attribute and replace it with
a
> src attribute, as javac has. Obviously its possible to add the nested
src
> elements without doing this, but if we change it then there's less
change
> for the user...
>
> thoughts?
>
> cheesr
> dim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
