On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> See item 10 of the v1.0 list :-)

(o:  yes, I read that of course after sending this!  Can I just check
though - #10 says to "change nested <src> param to <sourcepath> for
consistency", do you think we might be better off doing it the other way
around, that way we're consistant with javac as well.?

cheers
dim


> 
> Ara.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dmitri Colebatch
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:40 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] nested src path elements
> > 
> > hey,
> > 
> > I was just going to do feature request #453663
> >
> (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=453663&group_i
> d=
> > 31602&atid=402707) -
> > add support for nested src elements.  The request basically asks that
> > xdoclet behaves similar to the javac task, which leads me to the point
> > that the javac task expects syntax like:
> > 
> >     <javac destdir="${platform.bcf.build.classes.dir}"
> >            debug="on"
> >            deprecation="off"
> >            optimize="off"
> >            includes="com/nuix/**/*.java"
> >            excludes="com/nuix/component/**/*.java"
> >     >
> >         <src path="${platform.bcf.src.java.dir}" />
> >         <src path="${platform.bcf.src.components.dir}" />
> > 
> >         ....
> > 
> > but xdoclet wants:
> > 
> >       <ejbdoclet
> >          sourcepath="${java.dir}"
> >          destdir="${generated.java.dir}"
> >          classpathref="project.class.path"
> >          excludedtags="@version,@author"
> >          ejbspec="2.0">
> > 
> >          <fileset dir="${java.dir}">
> >             <include name="**/*Bean.java" />
> >          </fileset>
> > 
> >        ....
> > 
> > the key difference being sourcepath <-> src.  My question is then
> should
> > we phase out (or remove) the sourcepath attribute and replace it with
> a
> > src attribute, as javac has.  Obviously its possible to add the nested
> src
> > elements without doing this, but if we change it then there's less
> change
> > for the user...
> > 
> > thoughts?
> > 
> > cheesr
> > dim
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> 




_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to