> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Konstantin Priblouda > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Time to chekin xtags? > > > --- Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We'll release 1.1 this week (absolutely no more > > waits) and we all will > > start working on xjavadoc/xtags. Xjavadoc is > > radically new/independent > > so we can keep it in a separate module for some > > time, but xtags to me > > seems to be easier to tackle and integrate with > > existing xdoclet module. > > Let me release 1.1 this week and the next day you > > can check in xtags > > (plus all good ideas of Aslak's stuff). That's my > > viewpoint. > > Agreed to wait. But xtags shall be usable without > xdoclet - maybe somebody decides to produce > nice plugin for netbeans ( or jbuilder... ) to > tag classes easy way.
I view it as one of the core components. Use this component only, if you want to develop a netbeans plug-in/etc. It really is low-level/core. It's equal to .Net's Attribute/etc classes, very core! > And I think that templating engine needs reworking. > Current situation where subtask goes to tag handler > for class name and tags handler delegates back to > subtask is not very convenient... I'm open to any suggestions/proposal. What specifically you have in your mind in this regard? Cheers, Ara. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
