> On 2002.01.13 12:17:40 -0500 David Jencks wrote: > I think I saw a notice that you were not going to include the support for > jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generation in 1.1. Is there a list of problems with it? > jboss is somewhat interested in including xdoclet with the (jboss 3) > distribution. Since the dtd for this stuff may not be entirely stable at > this point should we consider including the template files in jboss' cvs?
Yup, David Budworth was working on it but according to him it crashes xdoclet 90% of time (unstable template) and the generated stuff isn't something jBoss accepts. So I had to disable it. Anyway, I invite jBoss developers to spend some time on it and complete/fix it and we'll make it part of the 1.1.1 release which we'll deliver maybe 2 weeks later. What's the release date for jboss 3? We'll try to have a working version of xdoclet ready for the release. The choice of jboss' cvs/xdoclet cvs is yours. XDoclet can act as a mere distribution channel for the template, but people regularly check out from xdoclet's cvs and build and use the latest stuff, and I think it's better to have jboss templates there too. It's good to see xdoclet in jboss3 distro:-) > Another point... Is there anything like a test suite for xdoclet? I > haven't seen it ;-) but think it might be very useful. If it would help I > (think I) have an xml comparator that might be adaptable to compare > generated output with expected output. There's no test suite but there will be a test suite very soon :o) > Yet another point... I've been starting to write some buffer generation > templates for emacs/jde that include xdoclet tags. This is in a very > primitive state, but I wonder if anyone else would find this interesting? Maybe. I guess it acts likea say class wizard, you click and it generates a new buffer? Ara. _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
