On 2002.01.14 02:14:45 -0500 Ara Abrahamian wrote: > > On 2002.01.13 12:17:40 -0500 David Jencks wrote: > > I think I saw a notice that you were not going to include the support > for > > jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generation in 1.1. Is there a list of problems with > it? > > jboss is somewhat interested in including xdoclet with the (jboss 3) > > distribution. Since the dtd for this stuff may not be entirely stable > at > > this point should we consider including the template files in jboss' > cvs? > > Yup, David Budworth was working on it but according to him it crashes > xdoclet 90% of time (unstable template) and the generated stuff isn't > something jBoss accepts. So I had to disable it. Anyway, I invite jBoss > developers to spend some time on it and complete/fix it and we'll make > it part of the 1.1.1 release which we'll deliver maybe 2 weeks later. > What's the release date for jboss 3? We'll try to have a working version > of xdoclet ready for the release.
I think marc wants to get another version (beta?) out soon and possibly a release in mid- feb. A point release soon with jboss cmp is good news. > > The choice of jboss' cvs/xdoclet cvs is yours. XDoclet can act as a mere > distribution channel for the template, but people regularly check out > from xdoclet's cvs and build and use the latest stuff, and I think it's > better to have jboss templates there too. It's good to see xdoclet in > jboss3 distro:-) I think keeping the templates with xdoclet is a good idea, since you seem to want to release often. > > > Another point... Is there anything like a test suite for xdoclet? I > > haven't seen it ;-) but think it might be very useful. If it would > help I > > (think I) have an xml comparator that might be adaptable to compare > > generated output with expected output. > > There's no test suite but there will be a test suite very soon :o) Very good news. > > > Yet another point... I've been starting to write some buffer > generation > > templates for emacs/jde that include xdoclet tags. This is in a very > > primitive state, but I wonder if anyone else would find this > interesting? > > Maybe. I guess it acts likea say class wizard, you click and it > generates a new buffer? Pretty much, jde already had some of those: mine includes lots of xdoclet tags so I don't have to remember which ones I need. Also, you can e.g. add methods with the javadoc + tags automatically -- I thought it was kind of handy for e.g. cmp2 abstract getter/setter that I want to expose. Thanks! david jencks > > Ara. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
