> But that's not what my point was. It was more of, do we take the > valid_values and split them. Or do what it's doing now, which is take > the field value and index into valid_values. > > But now, an aditional issue. Do we split up the tag value also? I don't > think we should. Is there any case where we allow multiple values for > the same tag? (ie view-type="local,remote") (yes i know this doesn't > work. it's just an example) > > IMHO, valid_values should have been a String[] with each value seperate. > the way it is now limits the content of what's valid (ie: no commas can > be present in the value). Not to mention the performance hit we get for > tokenizing the same strings over and over.
The problem is values="blabla" attribute of classTagValue/friends. There's no way to use String[] in xml-ish template (<XDtClass:classTagValue tagName="aa" paramName="bb" values="a,b,c"/>). We will eventually remove this comma-separated format because we're going to specify the valid values and stuff like that in a tag deployment xml file. So: fix is there's a mini bug, and wait for the xml tag def stuff. Cheers, Ara. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
