> 1. Someone mentioned on the list that the current xtags.xml are not strong > enough to do the validation he required, and he proposed we should look > into > XML Schema to use for this. But offcourse, this is again more work. > I like the current way, the XSL renders the docs nicely.
Xtags will handle it completely. You can't express all the rules as little xml elements. Forget about it for now, will be ok for v1.3. > For the stylebook: IMO a left and right frame is easier to navigate than > an > integrated TOC like the cactus one. And since we will have a pretty large > TOC (lotsa modules), it is not reset every time you go to another page > (reload). I would also use the XTree for all navigation. I like the way your recently committed tree looks. Ara. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel