> 1. Someone mentioned on the list that the current xtags.xml are not
strong
> enough to do the validation he required, and he proposed we should
look
> into
> XML Schema to use for this. But offcourse, this is again more work.
> I like the current way, the XSL renders the docs nicely.

Xtags will handle it completely. You can't express all the rules as
little xml elements. Forget about it for now, will be ok for v1.3.

> For the stylebook: IMO a left and right frame is easier to navigate
than
> an
> integrated TOC like the cactus one. And since we will have a pretty
large
> TOC (lotsa modules), it is not reset every time you go to another page
> (reload). I would also use the XTree for all navigation.

I like the way your recently committed tree looks.

Ara.


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to