> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik
> Hatcher
> Sent: 16. mai 2002 19:36
> To: Ara Abrahamian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Mathias Bogaert'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Strategies for doc generation
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mathias Bogaert'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:15 PM
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Strategies for doc generation
>
>
> > > 1) xdoclet/modules/foo/src/META-INF/xtags.xml
> > > This file is hand-written, and should be maintained by the module
> > > authors.
> > > We are already able to generate a nice table describing the tags. Done
> > > with XSLT.
> > > result: xdoclet/dist/docs/tags/foo-tags.html
> >
> > Xcellent.
> >
> > > 2) xdoclet/modules/foo/src/xdoclet/modules/foo/FooSubTask.java
> > > We can add @tags on the setFoo and createFoo methods. Then use XDoclet
> > > to generate subtask docs. (describing what to put in the build.xml
> > > scripts)
> > > result: xdoclet/dist/docs/subtasks/foo-subtask.html
> > > This needs to be done.
> >
> > That's what Eric was working on for Ant. @ant:task blabla.
> > We can ask Eric to donate his code ;-) And then extend it, and return it
> > back to him/Ant. I'm sure we can come up with something useful for both
> > Ant and xdoclet (the main difference is that xdoclet has lots of
> > subtasks while Ant doesn't in xdoclet's sense).
> >
> > Erik, comments?
>
> First, spell my name right! :)
>
> Yes, there is a proposal/xdocs directory in Ant's CVS repository that is
> fair game for anyone to use/abuse. There are custom XDoclet tags and
> subtasks. I haven't gotten it sophisticated enough to be recursive, might
> need some XDoclet expertise from you all to refine that when I finally get
> back to working on it soon.
>
> There really wasn't much need for me to have @tags anywhere on
> create/add/addConfigured/set methods but certainly if there is
> some metadata
> needed there for documentation purposes then sure. I do want it to drill
> down to document the sub-elements and datatypes that each task can have,
> certainly.
>
> Erik
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
