> > http://users.pandora.be/ees/xdoclet/development/design.html > > > ?? especially > > > "NO more support for EJB 1.0 and 1.1, use XDoclet > > > 1.2 for this"?? > > +1 > > -0 Our app servers are still on a version that only supports 1.1 (the > later ones that support 2.0 haven't gone through a full evaluation & > testing against our systems yet). I doubt we're the only ones. OTOH, as > you say, we could just stick to 1.2 (though that means I've less incentive > to get as involved with work on XD2). Besides, we'll still need an > ejbSpec version to cater for 2.0, 2.1, ... so is it that hard to include > 1.1 too? Generally it's just a case of skipping stuff for that version.
-0 from me too. I dont see the motivation for this. Essentially its a case of supporting one more dtd yes? With Aslak's work on XGG this should be a piece of cake... If there's a good reason for why we shouldn't support ejb1.x I'm happy to hear it, I just cant think of it. Also - I'd much rather support one version than two... cheers dim ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
