I have planned to let XGG read multiple DTDs in one go and generate one template to cover them all. It will insert conditionals around elements that are not common for all versions of the DTD.
-So EJB 1.1 should be easy to support. -1 for ditching EJB1.1. It would actually be a good exercise/test case for XGG to have support for 1.1. Aslak ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Stevens) Date: Monday, October 7, 2002 8:23 am Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process > A wise old hermit known only as Konstantin Priblouda > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said: > > > http://users.pandora.be/ees/xdoclet/development/design.html > > > ?? especially > > > "NO more support for EJB 1.0 and 1.1, use XDoclet > > > 1.2 for this"?? > > +1 > > -0 Our app servers are still on a version that only supports 1.1 > (the > later ones that support 2.0 haven't gone through a full evaluation > & > testing against our systems yet). I doubt we're the only ones. > OTOH, as > you say, we could just stick to 1.2 (though that means I've less > incentive > to get as involved with work on XD2). Besides, we'll still need > an > ejbSpec version to cater for 2.0, 2.1, ... so is it that hard to > include > 1.1 too? Generally it's just a case of skipping stuff for that > version. > > Andrew. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
