Andrew Stevens wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 01:06, Darryl Miles wrote: >> Is the XDoclet project active ? > > v1.x is fairly quiet these days, just the odd bit of maintenance and bug > fixing. I think XDoclet 2 may be more active, but since that moved to > Codehaus and its plugin (module) development has its own mailing list, > we don't hear much about it on xdoclet-devel & -user apart from > Konstantin telling us at frequent intervals that it's production-ready > :-) > >> How does that process work ? > > You're doing it - patch uploaded to JIRA and an occasional nag on the > mailing list :-) > I'll try and find time to take a look at it, hopefully later this week.
And 15 months rolls by. Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting the enthusiastic). Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place. I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this thread just to show the world you are still around. I see that in 2005 XDoclet from: http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html moved to: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/ It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled. Darryl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
