I'm a committer, but I don't have the keys to the castle (admin rights). Matt
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Darryl Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... and 12 more months roll by. > > > Who has access to sourceforge to list the 5 CVS write committers ? > > > Does anyone know of the sourceforge process to change the > "Administrative Control" of the project away from whomever sourceforge > Id currently has that control ? Or at least grant those right to > others people. > > > I would like to volunteer to do something (at the very least merge > patches in from JIRA that appear correct), but that something may only > take place once contact can be made with the project coordinator which > is active. > > Maybe sourceforge have a procedure to this sort of situation ? > > > > I Have CCed this email to those whom are or have been listed as > developers/committers/architects/founders both from the past and > present, could I urge you all to please login/recover/dig out your > sourceforce account details and see what access you have in relation to > the "xdoclet" project. > > Darryl > > > > Marco Schulze wrote: >>> And 15 months rolls by. >>> >>> Who exactly on this list has any form of committer access to the >>> projects listed below, what is the roadmap and is there any Apache style >>> committee for recycling committers (removing the inactive and adopting >>> the enthusiastic). >>> >>> Despite Java5 and annotations coming out XDoclet still has its place. >>> >>> I'd like to ask for a roll call of all those comitters to reply to this >>> thread just to show the world you are still around. >>> >>> >>> I see that in 2005 XDoclet from: >>> >>> http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/index.html >>> >>> moved to: >>> >>> http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/ >>> >>> >>> It appears (to me at least) in 2005 the entire project(s) stalled. >>> >>> >>> Darryl >> >> Hello Darryl, >> >> I've write-access to the CVS repository on xdoclet.sourceforge.net. I've no >> idea, however, who has the right to grant rights. Additionally, I've not >> yet registered with XDoclet 2 (codehaus.org). >> >> I totally agree that XDoclet is still extremely useful, because there are >> (despite annotations) still a lot of situations where code generation is >> necessary. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > xdoclet-devel mailing list > xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > -- http://raibledesigns.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
