yes, it's exclusive. we realised it was not good this way, so in cvs it's not exclusive but cumulative (is that the correct mathematical term? :-) Anyway, you get both @tags and merge file contents.
<aslak/> > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 1. november 2001 16:14 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] are merged servlet mappings exclusive? > > > Hi all -- still working with WebDoclet.... > > I have a servlet and servlet mapping defined via doclet tags in a servlet > source file, and I also have another servlet configured via a merged > servlets.xml and servlet-mappings.xml. > > If servlet-mappings.xml is present, the autogenerated mapping from the > doclet tags never appear in web.xml, but the merged mappings do show up. > If I remove servlet-mappings.xml, the autogenerated mappings appear, but > obviously the would-be merged mappings don't. > > Is there soem kind of exclusive behavior between these two methods? > > -jason > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
