Cool...thanks for the info.
-jason
Aslak Hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/01/2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
cc:
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] are merged servlet mappings exclusive?
yes, it's exclusive. we realised it was not good this way, so in cvs it's
not exclusive but cumulative (is that the correct mathematical term? :-)
Anyway, you get both @tags and merge file contents.
<aslak/>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 1. november 2001 16:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-user] are merged servlet mappings exclusive?
>
>
> Hi all -- still working with WebDoclet....
>
> I have a servlet and servlet mapping defined via doclet tags in a
servlet
> source file, and I also have another servlet configured via a merged
> servlets.xml and servlet-mappings.xml.
>
> If servlet-mappings.xml is present, the autogenerated mapping from the
> doclet tags never appear in web.xml, but the merged mappings do show up.
> If I remove servlet-mappings.xml, the autogenerated mappings appear, but
> obviously the would-be merged mappings don't.
>
> Is there soem kind of exclusive behavior between these two methods?
>
> -jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
