imo, code generation would solve both problems... atm I'm looking at how @ejb:aggregate or similar could be used with dataobjects to achieve a similar purpose. That way you get all the benefits...
cheesr dim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] ValueObjects > Yes, i was referring more to the use of reflection rather than the xml > stuff. > So far, I have been successful in using XDoclet value objects, so I am > looking forward to the new release. > Thanks, for your insight. > > Steve > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Steve Knight'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:51 PM > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] ValueObjects > > > > I am not too in favour of XML in entity bean. > > XML is sloooow : the writer talks about perf in creation of the XML. > > The problem is on the parsing of it : really really too slow. > > As the writer mention you also loose the object view in the client... > > > > Generating classes _or_ auto xml (or Map or ...) are opposite approach > > to the goal of simplifying the developement in J2EE world. > > > > I prefer using generated stuffs by a tool (well xdoclet here) than > > reflection, xml... kind of things. > > It is faster at run time. Period. > > There was an article on javaworld some months ago (or maybe o reilly??) > > describing the difference of approach better than I am able to do. > > > > It is a debate really and I don't believe there is a definitive answer. > > > > But be sure we will be able to do exactly the same in terms of > > functionnality in Value Object that what this article do. > > We can also give the same output using generated toString and it will be > > faster at run time than DOM, reflection stuffs. Hehe that is all the > > power of xdoclet. > > > > The trick is clever though. I don't want to criticize that. I just give > > my own opinion. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > > > Of Steve Knight > > > Sent: jeudi 21 mars 2002 17:52 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] ValueObjects > > > > > > > > > Mmmm, Xjavadoc. > > > sounds sweet...I am anxiously anticipating. > > > > > > By the way, what are your thoughts on the Dynamic Value > > > Objects article on > > > TheServeSide.com: > > > http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=CMP2 > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "'Steve Knight'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:11 AM > > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] ValueObjects > > > > > > > > > > Yep that was he has done. > > > > Please wait and you will get xjavadoc included for the same > > > price ;) > > > > Xjavadoc is far more important atm. Regards > > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > > > Behalf Of Steve > > > > > Knight > > > > > Sent: jeudi 21 mars 2002 15:55 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] ValueObjects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mostly, I am interested in the patches involving the new > > > "volatile" > > > > > tag and the fixes for the duplicate variable definition > > > problem. I > > > > > guess I will have to wait until next week :( > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "Steve Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:40 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] ValueObjects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The marcus one ? > > > > > > Not before next week I am afraid :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Steve Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > > any idea on when the new patches for ValueObjects will be > > > > > commited > > > > > > > to CVS? I would like to start trying them out to see if > > > > > they solve > > > > > > > some of my problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy AwardsR > > > > > > http://movies.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
