I just can't understand what tags I have to set.
Once more. AddressEJB represents the 'many'-side and CityEJB represents
the 'one'-side. I need to get unidirectional relationship from Address to
CIty, i.e. there is AddressLocal.getCIty() but no CityLocal.getAddresses().
I set up tags this way in AddressEJB:
* @ejb:relation name="addresses-city"
* role-name="address-has-city"
* target-role-name="city-has-addresses"
* target-ejb="City"
In ejb-jar.xml I get this, probably the right result according to the tags
I've specified:
<ejb-relation >
<ejb-relation-name>addresses-city</ejb-relation-name>
<!-- unidirectional -->
<ejb-relationship-role >
<ejb-relationship-role-name>address-has-city</ejb-relationship-role-name>
<multiplicity>One</multiplicity> <==== but how to get Many here?
<relationship-role-source >
<ejb-name>Address</ejb-name>
</relationship-role-source>
<cmr-field >
<cmr-field-name>city</cmr-field-name>
</cmr-field>
</ejb-relationship-role>
<ejb-relationship-role >
<ejb-relationship-role-name>city-has-addresses</ejb-relationship-role-name>
<multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
<relationship-role-source >
<ejb-name>City</ejb-name>
</relationship-role-source>
</ejb-relationship-role>
</ejb-relation>
TIA
alex
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Xdoclet-User (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Many-To-One unidirectional
>
>
> Do you have any source code?
> What _exactly_ is your problem? Is the generated code wrong,
> or are you
> wondering what tags to put in?
> I assume you're using 1.1.2.
>
> Aslak
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:01 pm
> Subject: [Xdoclet-user] Many-To-One unidirectional
>
> > I can't manage to get many-to-one indirectional relationship. Is it
> > possible with XDoclet?
> >
> > For example relationship between AddressBean and CityBean.
> > Address has one
> > City in it. But the same City could be found in many Addresses.
> > And the
> > direction of the relationship is from Address to City, i.e.
> > Address.getCity() but not CIty.getAddresses().
> >
> > Is it possible?
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________
> >
> > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors.
> > We supply
> > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
> >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> __________
> > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> >
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
