Thank you very much, Aslak. One more proof: RTFM. Sorry for being
inattentive.

alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'Xdoclet-User (E-mail)'
> Subject: Re: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Many-To-One unidirectional
>
>
> * @ejb:relation name="addresses-city"
>    *               role-name="address-has-city"
>    *               target-role-name="city-has-addresses"
>    *               target-ejb="City"
>    *               target-multiple="yes"  <===== LIKE THIS
>
> (It should be in the docs. At least the online ones)
> http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/ejbdoclet.html#relation
>
> HTH,
> Aslak
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:14 pm
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Many-To-One unidirectional
>
> >  I just can't understand what tags I have to set.
> >  Once more. AddressEJB represents the 'many'-side and CityEJB
> > representsthe 'one'-side. I need to get unidirectional
> > relationship from Address to
> > CIty, i.e. there is AddressLocal.getCIty() but no
> > CityLocal.getAddresses().  I set up tags this way in AddressEJB:
> >
> >   * @ejb:relation name="addresses-city"
> >   *               role-name="address-has-city"
> >   *               target-role-name="city-has-addresses"
> >   *               target-ejb="City"
> >
> >  In ejb-jar.xml I get this, probably the right result according
> > to the tags
> > I've specified:
> >      <ejb-relation >
> >         <ejb-relation-name>addresses-city</ejb-relation-name>
> >         <!-- unidirectional -->
> >         <ejb-relationship-role >
> >
> > <ejb-relationship-role-name>address-has-city</ejb-relationship-
> > role-name>
> >            <multiplicity>One</multiplicity> <==== but how to get
> > Many here?
> >            <relationship-role-source >
> >               <ejb-name>Address</ejb-name>
> >            </relationship-role-source>
> >            <cmr-field >
> >               <cmr-field-name>city</cmr-field-name>
> >            </cmr-field>
> >         </ejb-relationship-role>
> >         <ejb-relationship-role >
> >
> > <ejb-relationship-role-name>city-has-addresses</ejb-relationship-
> > role-name>
> >            <multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
> >            <relationship-role-source >
> >               <ejb-name>City</ejb-name>
> >            </relationship-role-source>
> >         </ejb-relationship-role>
> >      </ejb-relation>
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > alex
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:40 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: Xdoclet-User (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Many-To-One unidirectional
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you have any source code?
> > > What _exactly_ is your problem? Is the generated code wrong,
> > > or are you
> > > wondering what tags to put in?
> > > I assume you're using 1.1.2.
> > >
> > > Aslak
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Alex Loubyansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:01 pm
> > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] Many-To-One unidirectional
> > >
> > > >  I can't manage to get many-to-one indirectional relationship.
> > Is it
> > > > possible with XDoclet?
> > > >
> > > >  For example relationship between AddressBean and CityBean.
> > > > Address has one
> > > > City in it. But the same City could be found in many Addresses.
> > > > And the
> > > > direction of the relationship is from Address to City, i.e.
> > > > Address.getCity() but not CIty.getAddresses().
> > > >
> > > >  Is it possible?
> > > >
> > > > TIA,
> > > >
> > > > alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors.
> > > > We supply
> > > > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
> > > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > __________
> > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> > > >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
> mirrors. We supply
> the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to