sounds excellent!

are the tags tied to the getXXX() methods of a class? this was one thing that i changed with the new castor version that i was working on. since ormapping deals with classes(tables) and attributes(dbFields), i associated the @tags with class attributes instead of getXXX() methods. just seemed to make more sense.

also, if the @tags are tied to the fields, then one can simply create a skeleton class with just the attributes and associated @tags, then that .java file could be used to generate getXXX() and setXXX() methods for each attribute... this could really minimize the work of creating tedious entity/data objects...




At 11:28 02/11/07 +0100, you wrote:
Well i would suggest you to have a look to the JDO module, as it contains
already some generic tags for ormapping independant of jdo or jdo vendor:
@sql.table, @sql.field, @sql.relation

It would be really easy to rename the JDO module to ormapping module, and
provide several sub-modules to support the different technologies and
vendors.

Ludovic


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to