> are the tags tied to the getXXX() methods of a class? this was one thing > that i changed with the new castor version that i was working on. since > ormapping deals with classes(tables) and attributes(dbFields), i > associated > the @tags with class attributes instead of getXXX() methods. just seemed > to make more sense. > > also, if the @tags are tied to the fields, then one can simply create a > skeleton class with just the attributes and associated @tags, then > that .java file could be used to generate getXXX() and setXXX() methods > for > each attribute... this could really minimize the work of creating tedious > entity/data objects...
All IDEs generate getter/setter for you, why bother with that? Imho we should be able to put the tags on getter&setter&field. Ara. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
