RE: [Xdoclet-user] xdoclet 1.2 slower than 1.1.2

[Aslak Helles�y]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Torgeir
> Veimo
> Sent: 7. januar 2003 15:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] xdoclet 1.2 slower than 1.1.2
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 13:56, Aslak Helles�y wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Torgeir
> > > Veimo
> > > Sent: 7. januar 2003 13:29
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] xdoclet 1.2 slower than 1.1.2
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this normal? xdoclet v1.2 runs significantly slower (like twice as
> > > slow) as v1.1.2.
> > >
> >
> > That sounds ab-normal. Sun's Javadoc has been replaced with our
> xjavadoc,
> > which is significantly faster. What's your environment? Do you
> have a test
> > case for this?
>
> Well, It might simply be because it uses a lot more memory now. I run
> with jdk1.4.1 on linux, and need to set ANT_OPTS=-Xmx64m or more
> otherwise I get an out-of-memory error. That never happened with v1.1.2.
>

Are you parsing more files than you need to? Try to narrow down the files in
your <fileset> so that only the files with XDoclet @tags are included. That
will increase performance, and you'll need less memory.

Aslak

> --
> Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

N�HSDM隊X���'���u�����xZ+��'���+ح��� >.)��j+�Ԩ��a�x6I硶��
0��(~���(�whrW��ǫ����x%��Wv�%zÛ¬z�b��,���y�+��޶m����+-��.�ǟ�����+-��b�ا~��v�%zÛ¬z