> Well, I more or less thought of this also, but I didn't implement the > original jdo tag support or the vendor extensions and didn't want to > reimplement it all. Also I think the vendor-specific implementation gives > a lot more validation. > > If you want to look at this and come up with a proposal or patch I'll > certainly cooperate. Some people are actually using the current > tags so we > may want to support both.
It shouldn't be that hard to add one tag for the vendor extensions. I'm really suprised no one is doing this. I was doing great with XDoclet until I wanted to add a Kodo extension and now I had stop using XDoclet and edit the .jdo file by hand. If no one is interested in doing this I wouldn't mind taking a look. But I'm sure it'd take me longer since I've never seen the XDoclet source. Michael ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
