Of course it makes a difference - consider the location and number of foreign keys in each case.
On 2/10/03 6:34 pm, "Harkness, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Edward Kenworthy <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said: >> This is a unidirectional 1:m so yes you do need a relationship table. > > I have several unidirectional N:1 relations, but I have *zero* relation > tables. Granted, they're N:1 and not 1:N, but I don't see how that would > make any difference. > > MailMessages ---1:N--> Users > messageKey ID > ... messageKey > ... > > The only reason you should need to use a relation table is for N:M > relations. Have I just lucked out in not choosing a uni 1:N? Does CMR > truly require that you model your schema differently from normal? This > seems 100% counter to one of the goals of EJB: being able to map entity > beans to existing schemas. > > Am I missing something? > > David Harkness > Sr. Software Engineer > Sony Pictures Digital Networks > (310) 482-4756 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
