I've thought about this a fair bit.. and thought that having the tags in java would break the advantage of giving site builders non java files to work on.. What i did end up thinking was perhaps having xdoclet tags in scriplets that would be generated into java and then the tags could be processed.

then in tiles themselves

<%
/**
* @struts.tiles-definition
*       extends="foo.layout"
*/
%>

Needs thinking through a few iterations. But thats where my brain started taking me. The pain would be preprocessing the jsp's and then generating the xml resources.

I cant see how the tags would be that useful otherwise.


On 9 Jun 2004, at 20:21, Matt Raible wrote:

I don't believe anyone has done what you're looking for - but I'm willing to help. Do you have any idea of what the syntax might look like in the action class?

Matt

On Jun 9, 2004, at 7:28 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:

I'm interested in getting the tiles-defs.xml file generated
automatically.

Have anyone done something along the lines of defining definitions in
struts action classes similar to the @struts:action tags?

--
Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation Hackers Unite! GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event. GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway http://2004/guadec.org _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user




------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation Hackers Unite! GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event. GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway http://2004/guadec.org _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to