--- Daniel Lipofsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How backwards compatible is it? We have a few > custom xdt templates in addition to everything else. Partially. Since XD1 was developed at the same time as XD2. And to get rid of XDT and use more generic template enines was one of the design goals of XD2. Now it uses jelly / velocity and possibly freemarker ( though there are no plugins utilizing it ) Though really funny thing is, that jelly credits XDoclet1 as inspiration for thei template engine ;) @-Tags are mostly compatible, up to the split time. But XD2 tags are self validating and defined formally. I would say it should be pretty easy to rewrite XDT templates to jelly. > And is there websphere support? 1.2.3 had minimal > websphere support (it's why we upgraded from 1.2.2), > but it would be really nice to have good websphere > support. Websphere what? If you mean EJB, there is not much usable for properitary containers. We still lack of commiters in this field ( it happens that nobody of actual commiters has use case for it ) Best suported stuff is XWork ( Struts2 ), Hibernate, ActionScript. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org ____________________________________________________________________________________ Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list xdoclet-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
