On 20.05.25 17:24, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Hello Andrew
> On 20/05/2025 2:47 pm, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>> An attempt to write access the register (i.e. GICR_PROPBASER, GICR_PENDBASER)
>> which should be ignored (i.e. no virtual ITS present) causes the data about
>
> Do you mean "data abort" here?
yes
If not, I can't parse the sentence.
>
>> due to incorrect check at the write_ignore_64 label. The check should be
>> inverted.
>>
>> Fixes: c4d6bbdc12e5 ("xen/arm: vgic-v3: Support 32-bit access for 64-bit
>> registers")
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshche...@epam.com>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> index 2eaa48fadb..b366b046a2 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ bad_width:
>> return 0;
>>
>> write_ignore_64:
>> - if ( vgic_reg64_check_access(dabt) ) goto bad_width;
>> + if ( !vgic_reg64_check_access(dabt) ) goto bad_width;
>
> As you're modifying anyway, the goto should be on the next line.
ok, will move
>
> ~Andrew
