Hi Volodymyr,
Thank you for your review.
On 27.08.25 01:30, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Leonid Komarianskyi <leonid_komarians...@epam.com> writes:
>
>> The do_IRQ() function is the main handler for processing IRQs.
>
> but you are making change to gic_interrupt() function... I think you
> need to update the commit message and subject.
>
>> Currently, due to restrictive checks, it does not process interrupt
>> numbers greater than 1024. This patch updates the condition to allow
>
> But check reads "irq < 1020"...
>
>> the handling of interrupts from the eSPI range.
>>
>
> With commit message fixed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>
>
Oh, yes, my mistakes. I will update the commit message in V4.
>> Signed-off-by: Leonid Komarianskyi <leonid_komarians...@epam.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - no changes
>>
>> Changes in V3:
>> - no changes
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> index b88237ccda..634b77c987 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int
>> is_fiq)
>> /* Reading IRQ will ACK it */
>> irq = gic_hw_ops->read_irq();
>>
>> - if ( likely(irq >= GIC_SGI_STATIC_MAX && irq < 1020) )
>> + if ( likely(irq >= GIC_SGI_STATIC_MAX && irq < 1020) ||
>> is_espi(irq) )
>> {
>> isb();
>> do_IRQ(regs, irq, is_fiq);
>
Best regards,
Leonid
