On 20.11.2025 10:58, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Existing callers where already generating the passed cpumask using > cpumask_of() to contain a single target CPU. Reduce complexity by passing > the single target CPU as an integer parameter. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> > --- > The function names are misleading, as {,p}irq_set_affinity() doesn't adjust > the affinity of the interrupt (desc->affinity) but the interrupt target > itself. Further cleanup might be helpful to correctly differentiate > between setting interrupt affinity vs setting interrupt target.
Indeed, I wanted to mention this as well. As you touch all callers anyway, how about doing a rename (whether to "target" or "binding" or yet something else) right here? Jan
