Hi Stefano,
On 10/11/2014 12:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 15:26 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
That is to guard against somebody building against libxc or libxl and
then becoming dependent on this and then complaining that it is not in
Xen 4.6.
libxc does not have a stable API and libxl doesn't expose this interface
at all. At the hypercall level this is a domctl which simliarly has no
stable interface.
So I don't think there is any need to wrap anything or guard against
anything.
That's true. A comment in the header file wouldn't hurt though.
It looks like that Ian has already pushed the patch. Do I need to send a
follow-up?
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
