>>> On 09.11.17 at 16:07, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 06:18:21AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 09.11.17 at 12:31, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:49:23PM +0530, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
>> >> +static int ns16550_init_dt(struct ns16550 *uart,
>> >> + const struct dt_device_node *dev)
>> >> +{
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> +}
>> >> +#endif
>> >> +
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> >> +#include <xen/acpi.h>
>> >
>> > Please place the include at the top of the file, together with the
>> > other ones.
>>
>> I disagree here, at least as long as that header isn't itself expanding
>> to nothing (or only stubs) when !CONFIG_ACPI.
>
> The header already has a CONFIG_ACPI guard inside, but it doesn't
> cover the full content, so my suggestion was to move the include to
> the top of the file, but keeping the CONFIG_ACPI guards around it.
Ah, I see. I'd then still prefer one less #ifdef by keeping it where it
is, but that's a matter of taste I admit.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
