On 25/03/15 14:22, Ian Campbell wrote:
> +static int vtimer_cntp_cval(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint64_t *r, int
> read)
> +{
> + struct vcpu *v = current;
> +
> + if ( psr_mode_is_user(regs) &&
> + !(READ_SYSREG(CNTKCTL_EL1) & CNTKCTL_EL1_EL0PTEN) )
Sorry, I didn't notice it on my previous review.
CNTKCTL_EL1_EL0PTEN and psr_mode_is_user are only defined in
respectively patch #6 and #4.
Can you invert the patches to avoid build breakage during bisection?
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
