On 14/04/15 13:24, Jaggi, Manish wrote: > [manish] Table is indeed a good option, but I think changing the name > of arm_smmu_xen_device to something like arch_smmu_device make more > sense as arm_smmu_xen_device and arm_smmu_device are not differentiable > just by name.
Can you explain how arch_smmu_device and arm_smmu_device are easier to differentiate? There is only 2 letters difference... Also, what does "arch" stands for? The SMMU driver is already ARM specific... Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
