Hi Ian, On 16/07/2015 10:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
In device_tree_for_each_node the call to the callback was using {address,size}_cells[depth - 1], which at depth 0 could read off the front of the array.We already handled this correctly in the rest of the loop so fixup this instance as well. Reported-by: Chris (Christopher) Brand <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]> Cc: Chris (Christopher) Brand <[email protected]>
Good catch! Do you plan to backport to Xen 4.5 and apply to Xen 4.6? Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <[email protected]> Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
