> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 17 February 2016 10:22 > To: Paul Durrant; Kevin Tian; Zhang Yu > Cc: Andrew Cooper; George Dunlap; Ian Campbell; Ian Jackson; Stefano > Stabellini; Wei Liu; Zhiyuan Lv; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; George Dunlap; Keir > (Xen.org) > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] tools: introduce parameter > max_wp_ram_ranges. > > >>> On 17.02.16 at 10:58, <kevin.t...@intel.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the help. Let's see whether we can have some solution ready > for > > 4.7. :-) > > Since we now seem to all agree that a different approach is going to > be taken, I think we indeed should revert f5a32c5b8e ("x86/HVM: > differentiate IO/mem resources tracked by ioreq server"). Please > voice objections to the plan pretty soon. >
I'm happy with reversion at this point. Paul _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
