> From: Paul Durrant [mailto:paul.durr...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 6:24 PM > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > > Sent: 17 February 2016 10:22 > > To: Paul Durrant; Kevin Tian; Zhang Yu > > Cc: Andrew Cooper; George Dunlap; Ian Campbell; Ian Jackson; Stefano > > Stabellini; Wei Liu; Zhiyuan Lv; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; George Dunlap; > > Keir > > (Xen.org) > > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] tools: introduce parameter > > max_wp_ram_ranges. > > > > >>> On 17.02.16 at 10:58, <kevin.t...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the help. Let's see whether we can have some solution ready > > for > > > 4.7. :-) > > > > Since we now seem to all agree that a different approach is going to > > be taken, I think we indeed should revert f5a32c5b8e ("x86/HVM: > > differentiate IO/mem resources tracked by ioreq server"). Please > > voice objections to the plan pretty soon. > > > > I'm happy with reversion at this point. >
Agree. Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel