> -----Original Message-----
[snip]
> >
> > For clarity, do you expect any existing use of HVMMEM_mmio_write_dm
> to continue to *function*? I agree that things should continue to build, but 
> if
> they don't need to function then the now redundant p2m type should be
> removed IMO and any attempt to set a page to HVMMEM_mmio_write_dm
> (or the new HVMMEM_unused) name should result in -EINVAL. What is your
> position on this?
> >
> 
> Thanks, Paul.
> My expectation is that HVMMEM_mmio_write_dm shall fail in new xen
> version, but I do not think we need to remove the p2m type, just
> rename it could be OK.
> 

I think we need George's response before we can proceed.

  Paul
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to