> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 28 April 2016 11:03 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: Andrew Cooper; George Dunlap; Wei Liu; JunNakajima; Kevin Tian; > Zhiyuan Lv; Zhang Yu; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Keir (Xen.org); Tim (Xen.org) > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/ioreq server(patch for 4.7): > Rename p2m_mmio_write_dm to p2m_ioreq_server. > > >>> On 28.04.16 at 09:14, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> From: Yu, Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com] > >> Sent: 28 April 2016 03:47 > >> Besides, do you think it acceptable we just replace p2m_mmio_write_dm > >> with p2m_ioreq_server in next version, or should we remove this p2m > >> type and define p2m_ioreq_server with a different value? :) > >> > > > > p2m_ioreq_server becomes defunct after the aforementioned patch. With > that > > patch applied there will be no way to set that type on a p2m entry so it > > should be ok to re-use the type. > > s/p2m_ioreq_server/p2m_mmio_write_dm/ ? >
Yes, that's what I meant. Paul > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
