On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote: > >> On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a > >>> little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We > >>> have > >>> - osstest.git > >>> - there also is osstest/*.git which seems to be odd and seems to have been > >>> inactive for a while (not very clear to me what these do) > >>> - and we have old and inactive xentesttools/*.git > >> They are not inactive. I have some patches for it and we are using > >> it (Boris and me). > > That is good to know. > > > >>> - and we are adding a new repo for XTF > >>> > >>> > >>> Maybe, moving everything test related under testing/* or test/* would be > >>> sensible, but that would cause some disruption (not sure how bad that > >>> would be). It would address A, B and D. It wouldn't make C much worse than > >>> now. > >> I don't mind the xentesttools going under a 'test' directory. > > @Ian, @George: Any other views regarding say osstest and the other > > osstest/* directories? > > > > @Andrew: would something like test/xtf.git work > > It would, although given a straight choice I would prefer > xen-test-framework.git over its abbreviation.
+1 > > ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
